Argentina’s Milei Administration: Unveiling the ‘Chainsaw Plan’ and Controversial Measures


The first week of Javier Milei’s administration in Argentina has been marked by controversial policies and decisions that have garnered attention and criticism. In his campaign, the ultra-liberal economist advocated for freedom and radical change, but his actions as president have raised concerns about the direction the country is headed.

One of the first moves by Milei was to reverse a 2018 rule that prohibited relatives of elected officials from holding positions in public administration. This decision raised eyebrows and led to the appointment of Milei’s sister, Karina Milei, as the general secretary of the administration. While some argue that Karina is qualified for the role and will assist the president in his duties, others see it as a clear case of nepotism and a betrayal of Milei’s promise to break with the past and eliminate corruption.

Another controversial policy introduced during Milei’s first week in office was a regulation proposed by Argentina’s Minister of National Security, Patricia Bullrich, that would impose harsh penalties, including arrest, on protesters who block streets during demonstrations. Bullrich argues that these protests disrupt normal life and lead to disorder and non-compliance with the law. However, critics see this as a violation of the right to peaceful assembly and an attempt to silence dissent.

Milei’s economic plan for Argentina, known as the “Chainsaw Plan,” has also caused controversy. The plan, which includes reducing subsidies, canceling tenders, and devaluing the peso, has been criticized for its potential impact on the most vulnerable members of society. Supporters argue that these bold actions are necessary to address the country’s budget imbalance and prevent hyperinflation, but critics worry about the potential social and economic consequences.

The plan has already led to a significant increase in gasoline prices, causing a rush to the gas stations. In addition to devaluing the peso, the plan also includes import duties and withholding taxes, cuts in subsidies for energy and transportation, and reductions in government spending and employment.

While the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has applauded Milei’s audacity and commitment to improving public finances, many in Argentina remain skeptical. They question whether these measures will truly benefit the most vulnerable members of society and argue that there needs to be a more comprehensive and inclusive approach to solving the country’s economic challenges.

Furthermore, Milei’s decision to prioritize certain social initiatives over others has raised concerns about potential bias and favoritism. Critics argue that social programs should be based on need and should not require intermediaries or middlemen.

In conclusion, the first week of Milei’s administration in Argentina has been marked by contentious policies, including the appointment of the president’s sister to a key position, the threat of imprisonment for protesters, and a controversial economic plan. While some argue that these actions are necessary and bold, others question their impact on the most vulnerable members of society and call for a more inclusive and comprehensive approach to governance. Only time will tell the true effects of these policies on Argentina and its people.