Ads
Throughout the campaign, the ultraliberal candidate has faced criticism for failing to provide a clear explanation of where the necessary funds to dollarize South America’s second-largest economy, Argentina, would come from. This lack of transparency regarding Argentina’s US dollar reserves has become a pressing concern for the country’s economy. Without any available cash, it seems like Milei is attempting to create a lemonade without any lemons.
One of the prominent symbols of the “mileista” campaign is the motosserra, a tool that represents the candidate’s ambitious plan to significantly reduce government spending. This tool is seen as a symbolic representation of Milei’s desire to cut down on unnecessary expenses. In a country where the government’s share of Gross Inner Budget (GIB) consumption reaches nearly 40%, it is understandable why Milei advocates for a reduction in spending. He claims that the motorcycle accounts for one-third of all government expenses, indicating the need for substantial changes.
However, experts argue that the power of the motoserra may be dwindling. As the campaign progressed, the candidate’s tone softened, leading many to question his ability to carry out his proposed reforms effectively. While Milei has been critical of government subsidies in the past, he has recently promised a more gradual approach to change. This shift in tone is likely an attempt to appeal to a broader audience and to address concerns raised by the general public. Sergio Massa, a rival candidate, has also moderated his plans to shrink the size of the state due to widespread scare tactics from the government. Massa has assured the public that there will be no significant increases in the cost of basic necessities like electricity or fuel. He further pledges not to terminate public employees or privatize important sectors like education and healthcare.
The change in both candidates’ tones seems to make political sense. Sergio Massa is attempting to appeal to the radical voters who supported Milei in the first round. By adopting a more moderate approach, Massa hopes to convince these voters to choose him in the upcoming election. Milei, on the other hand, is trying to broaden his appeal beyond his staunch supporters by presenting a more realistic and gradual plan for reform. These strategic shifts in tone are crucial for both candidates if they are to attract undecided voters.
As the election approaches, the question of whether Milei can successfully implement his proposed reforms if elected remains. While Milei has outlined his desires and intentions, the feasibility of putting these plans into action is uncertain. The lack of clarity regarding how he plans to finance the dollarization of the economy raises concerns. Additionally, skeptics question whether the necessary political support and consensus can be obtained to enact such drastic changes.
In conclusion, the ultraliberal candidate, Milei, has faced criticism for his failure to explain the financial source for dollarizing Argentina’s economy. The absence of US dollar reserves is a pressing issue for the country. Milei’s motoserra serves as a symbol of his commitment to reducing government spending. However, his softened tone and promise of gradual change have raised doubts about the feasibility of his proposed reforms. Sergio Massa, another candidate, has also moderated his plans to attract a wider voter base. As the election draws near, the focus now shifts to whether Milei can translate his rhetoric into action, should she emerge as the victor.
